Why smart digital marketers don’t focus on Facebook or Twitter
Why smart digital marketers don’t focus on Facebook or Twitter:
from VentureBeat
Customers acquired via Twitter are worth 23 percent less, and Facebook brings in just barely average clients. But pay-per-click advertising brings in customers worth 46 percent more, and organic search brings in buyers who are worth a massive 54 percent more than your average customer.
Even lowly old e-mail marketing beats social, with 12 percent more valuable customers.
Lifecycle marketing company Custora regularly studies customer acquisition and other key metrics in the $200 billion U.S. digital marketing and commerce market, based on aggregated data from millions of U.S. customers and top e-commerce retailers. Today, the company released data on the lifetime value of customers based on the channel used to acquire them.
The results are astonishing.
Channel | Customer lifetime value (as a percentage relative to average) |
Organic searchPay-per click and cost-per-click adsReferralE-mail Affiliate marketing | 54.25%46.5%26.1%11.81% 7.53% 1.31% -23.36% |
But you must take the results in context.

Still, social networks have a long way to go to be as lucrative as search engines. (Yes, we might as well just say as lucrative as Google.)
One other interesting result? Rural areas offer higher-value customers, mostly because rural residents have few shopping options and are more likely to buy items online, particularly specialty items. Who would have known that Wyoming customers are 28 percent more valuable than the average American?
The only unfortunate thing, of course, is that there are so few of them.
Custora’s results are based on two years of data from 72 million American customers shopping at 86 U.S. retailers spanning 14 industries.
Filed under: Business, Enterprise, Entrepreneur, Social


No comments:
Post a Comment