The “Usual Fixes” for Sales Problems (And Why They Fail)
The “Usual Fixes” for Sales Problems (And Why They Fail):from SalesPerformance.com
By Michael Webb
The usual fixes for sales problems usually fail because the actual
problem—and its cause—is rarely understood, or even identified.
problem—and its cause—is rarely understood, or even identified.
Without understanding the chain of cause and effect between your sales activities and customers’ actions, you have a limited inventory of solutions to business challenges. I call these “the usual fixes” because they are so prevalent and because they usually fail to generate lasting improvement.
The usual fixes include:
- Replacing the sales manager or salespeople
- Trying a new type of sales training
- Launching a new lead-generation program in marketing
- Installing or upgrading customerThe person who pays for and/or uses your products and services. Also known as the "end user" (as opposed to channel partner). relationship management (CRM) or sales force automation (SFA) software
- Changing the incentive plan or holding a sales contest
- Reassigning accounts or redrawing sales territories
- Hiring a new ad agency to tweak the brand image
Another view of the failure modes of common fixes is shown in Figure 1.
Figure 1:
I’m not saying the usual fixes are always wrong. I’m saying they can’t represent genuine solutions unless three things are true:
- The sales organization has agreed on operating definitions around its primary terms of production, such as leads, qualified opportunities, customers, etc. (meaning they can be traced to observable characteristics).
- The data gathered from sales operations demonstrates numerically the likely bottlenecks and causes of problems.
- The fix directly addresses causes.
In addition, the usual fixes do little to address the most common barriers to higher sales performance. These barriers include poorly conceived valueThat which one (i.e., the customerThe person who pays for and/or uses your products and services. Also known as the "end user" (as opposed to channel partner).) acts to gain and/or keep. Also, that which our own company acts to gain and/or keep. propositions, lack of operating definitions for key variables (such as “lead,” “qualified prospect” and “customerThe person who pays for and/or uses your products and services. Also known as the "end user" (as opposed to channel partner).”), administrative tasks assigned to salespeople, problems in customerThe person who pays for and/or uses your products and services. Also known as the "end user" (as opposed to channel partner). training or service, marketing initiatives unconnected to sales efforts, and misaligned incentive programs. These problems can be identified, analyzed and addressed when management approaches marketing, sales, and service as a processA set of activities, through which work flows, aimed at a common result.—and sets the usual fixes aside.
Questions to Consider
- How many of the usual fixes have we tried in the past two to four years?
- How did we decide to implement each fix?
- How have they added valueThat which one (i.e., the customerThe person who pays for and/or uses your products and services. Also known as the "end user" (as opposed to channel partner).) acts to gain and/or keep. Also, that which our own company acts to gain and/or keep. for customers or improved the CustomerThe person who pays for and/or uses your products and services. Also known as the "end user" (as opposed to channel partner).’s Journey?
- How have they made selling easier, more efficient or more effective?
- What desirable or undesirable results have been achieved by these attempts at improvement?
No comments:
Post a Comment