1/22/2013

How Technology on the Trade Show Floor Can Help Your Sales Team Work Smarter and Sell More

How Technology on the Trade Show Floor Can Help Your Sales Team Work Smarter and Sell More:from B2B Lead Generation Blog Podcast 

Trade shows and conferences are still the biggest areas of investment for marketers, according to the most recent MarketingSherpa B2B Marketing Benchmark Report. And, as we marketers have embraced digital, the value of face-to-face interactions has increased.
There really isn’t a digital replacement for shaking someone’s hand or reading their body language and all the other benefits of human interaction. It’s all about building relationships.
Yet, many companies still measure marketers on cost-per-lead metrics when such metrics are inadequate for measuring face-to-face interactions at trade shows.
The real value of trade show interactions
Consider this: The cost of having one qualified face-to-face meeting with a prospect is often hundreds of dollars; it’s often $30 to $100 to have a phone conversation. CEOs need to look at the economics of competitive market dialogue holistically, with Marketing and Sales working together to walk customers and prospects through the buying cycle as economically as possible.
From this perspective, the cost of face-to-face conversations takes on a very different perspective. Trade shows and conferences are a great way to have many face-to-face meetings in a short time.
Plus, you can learn a lot at a trade shows from customers, prospects and even competitors.
Optimizing face-to-face conversations at trade shows
The challenge is that for those staffing booths, the hours are long and the conversations unending. To capitalize on these face-to-face interactions, the trade show team needs a much better way to distill conversations for future follow-up, especially since so many people who will be doing the following up won’t be the ones who spoke to the customer or prospect at the event.
Why not direct some trade show investment to a better means of capturing the conversation? For example:
  1. Most trade show name badges include quick response (QR) codes that detail prospects’ names, titles and contact information. Why not scan these codes with a smartphone or an iPad? When scanned and populated into your CRM, you eliminate the data entry errors that inevitably happen when business cards are entered manually.
  2. Associate this information with a simple form that the sales professional can access from a smartphone or an iPad and use to distill the conversation. You could include:
    • A few key pain points/motivations that relate to your solutions
    • One or two qualifying questions, such as the size of the account
    • A drop down for the contact’s position, e.g., CxO, VP, director, practitioner
    • A short free-form text field the rep can use to write a note
Invest in working smarter
A (relatively) small technology investment will help sales and event professionals work smarter. They’ll instantly capture why customers might want to buy your product and be able to follow up with the most relevant conversation. Sales professionals can then subsequently focus on the issues that are most important to the prospects whether it’s a week or a month after the trade show.
Which brings me to my final point: Unless there is a specific, time-sensitive request by the prospect, hold off on follow-up until at least a week after the event. Having been out of the office for a few days, the prospect’s hair will be on fire, and very likely, for the next few days thereafter, his or her inbox and email will be filled with messages.
Of course, many vendor messages will be generic and therefore ineffective.  Yours, on the other hand, will connect with the prospects’ motivations and more likely convert them into pipeline.
Related Resources:
Trade Show Follow-Up: 5 tips to optimize response
Nine Simple Tactics to Drive a Higher Return on Trade Show Investment
How to Use Lead Scoring to Drive the Highest Return on Your Trade-Show Investment
Lead Generation: 39% say offline lead gen has somewhat decreased
Lead Generation: Trends in 2012 marketing budgets

No comments: